Sheetz says billboards staying put
By Joe Mandak
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Sheetz Inc., the Altoona-based convenience store chain, on Tuesday
announced it will not take
down 36 billboards in the state that advertise tobacco products.
Sheetz's decision is the latest salvo in a war of words between
the chain and Attorney General Mike
Fisher, who last week sent Sheetz officials a letter asking
them to remove the signs.
Fisher's office believes the signs should come down under a settlement
that Fisher's office and 45
other state attorneys general reached with Big Tobacco in November
1998. That master settlement
agreement calls for the tobacco companies to pay $206 billion
to the states over the next 25 years -
$11 billion of which will go to Pennsylvania.
The settlement resulted from a lawsuit filed by the states alleging
that the major tobacco companies
knowingly advertised and promoted their products in a way designed
to addict customers -
including children.
As part of the settlement, the tobacco companies agreed to stop
using billboards to advertise their
products.
By extension, Fisher believes, retailers, too, should stop using
billboards to advertise tobacco -
although his office has stopped short of explicitly saying that
doing so violates the settlement.
In the Greensburg area, the billboards in question read:
"Leading brand cigarette packs as low as $2.34 plus tax. Limited
time at participating stores. Any
cheaper, we'd be in jail. Sheetz."
However, the lawsuit that spawned the settlement did not target
tobacco retailers, nor were they
involved in settlement discussions.
Further, Fisher spokesman Sean Connolly told the Tribune-Review
last week that the "language in
the settlement was purposely ambiguous ... (because) the goal
under the national settlement was to
take down the billboards so that children aren't exposed to
this advertising."
Connolly said advertisers and retailers weren't targeted in the
tobacco lawsuit, in part, because there
were "First Amendment" questions about whether they could legally
be forced to stop advertising a
product they sell legally.
As such, Sheetz officials claim the settlement doesn't bind them
or other retailers, and that's why
they decided not to pull their billboards yesterday.
Louis Sheetz, executive vice president of marketing for the chain,
was unavailable for comment
yesterday.
But his office issued a short press release in which he is quoted
as saying: "Sheetz officials spoke
with a representative from the Attorney General's office late
(Tuesday) morning. .... Although no
formal resolutions were reached, Sheetz and the Attorney General's
office will continue to work
through the issues.
"The Attorney General's office did once again agree that `Sheetz
is doing absolutely nothing
improper, illegal or in violation of the current master settlement
agreement,'" the release continued.
"Sheetz currently has 36 billboards posted in Pennsylvania that
advertise tobacco messages. At this
time, the company will not change its current advertising schedule
and will keep the billboards up
until the first part of January as planned."
Connolly expressed disappointment that Sheetz declined to pull
the billboards, but stopped short of
threatening legal action.
"However, we disagree with (Sheetz's) statement that we have
cleared them of any violation of the
master settlement agreement," Connolly said. "It's unfortunate
that Sheetz has decided to continue
this billboard campaign when other retailers have decided to
take theirs down."
Last month, Wawa Food Markets, a Delaware chain with several
stores in the Philadelphia area,
pulled their cigarette billboards after Fisher's office threatened
legal action.
Connolly said the Sheetz statement was correct in saying that
Fisher's office "will continue to work
with Sheetz on this issue."
"There are no meetings set ... but we are open to discussing
it with them. We're also going to be
discussing it with other attorneys general at a national meeting
this week that will also include
representatives from the tobacco manufacturers," Connolly said.
"I'm sure the Sheetz issue will be a topic of discussion."
And Connolly promised that legal action has not been ruled out.
"That's being mulled. I guess the simple way to put it is we've
asked them to voluntarily take down
their billboards and they have declined. Now we'll see where
we go from here," he said.